PREOPERATIVE
DIAGNOSIS: Stellate laceration to
the forehead.
PROCEDURE:
Irrigation,
debridement, and complex repair of stellate laceration on the forehead. Total length of repair, approximately 1.8 cm.
ANESTHESIA:
A 1% lidocaine with
epinephrine.
COMPLICATIONS: None.
INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY: This patient is a 46-year-old white male who was leading a meeting and
turned suddenly and struck his face on a door.
He sustained a laceration to the forehead and also bumped his nose and
his knee. He presented to the Emergency
Room for evaluation and had requested a plastic surgical consultation. The patient denies any loss of
consciousness. Denies any other
injuries. He has no difficulty breathing
through his nose and had a little bit of a bloody nose afterwards. He is up-to-date with immunizations. He denies any significant past medical
history. Examination reveals the patient
in no acute distress. He is alert and
oriented x3. He has a stellate-type
laceration with multiple flap components in the mid-forehead, measuring a total
length of approximately 1.8 cm. The skin
edges are irregular. The skin laceration
is beveled and extends into the subcutaneous tissue. Extraocular movements are intact. Vision is grossly normal. There is no maxillary or periorbital
tenderness. Occlusal opening and closing
is normal. He does have some contusional changes along the dorsum
of his nose with some mild tenderness.
The nasal bones do appear to be midline, although he does have a
slightly deviated septum, which appears chronic. There is no septal hematoma. I discussed the findings with the patient. The patient requests repair of the stellate
laceration. In regards to the nose, at
this time we will not perform any nasal x-ray since it really would not help
with his treatment. The bones do appear
midline, but we will wait until we reevaluate the patient on Friday. If the nose does appear to be deviated, we
will obtain x-rays. Otherwise, the patient
would prefer to treat it conservatively and try to avoid surgery. The potential risks and complications of the
surgical procedure were thoroughly discussed with him and included, but are not
limited to bleeding, infection, scarring, asymmetry, deformity, recurrence,
problems with healing, hypo or hyperpigmentation, hypertrophic or keloid
scarring, widening of the scar, and the need for further surgery. He is fully informed that there will be
scars, scars are permanent, and no guarantees can be given as to the final
outcome, appearance, location, or length of the scars. The patient states he understands. All of his questions were answered and he
gives consent.
PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: The patient was placed in a supine position,
where the area was prepped and draped using sterile technique. The wound was infiltrated with 1% lidocaine
with epinephrine. The wound was
explored. No foreign material was
noted. Conservative debridement of the
skin edges was performed in order to allow better approximation of the
tissues. After thorough irrigation, the
tissues were approximated using multiple interrupted buried 5-0 Vicryl sutures
to approximate the subcutaneous tissue and dermis, followed by 5-0 Monocryl in
a subcuticular fashion. Dermabond was
then applied and once dry, Mastisol and Steri-Strips. Total length of repair was approximately 1.8
cm. The patient tolerated the procedure
well and was given instructions in regards to care. Informed to call the office tomorrow for a
followup appointment on Friday and states he understands all of the
instructions.
No comments:
Post a Comment